Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal employees have until February 6 to choose whether to their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be enabled to take leave and be paid until completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment lawyer who represents federal employees as a big part of her practice, employment so I asked her for her interpretation about what OPM’s deferred resignation program would really mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I actually don’t consider it so much a deal. I believe it’s a request to resign with a vague guarantee that, possibly, you might be kept in administrative leave status for as much as eight months – but no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have been utilizing the term buyout to describe what this is due to the fact that there appears to be the offer of administrative leave for employment as much as eight months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never explain it as a buyout. I believe that’s a very misleading term to utilize in this scenario. When you think about a buyout, there’s normally some sort of composed contract or a concrete deal to offer a benefit in exchange for waiving specific rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for employment your suggestions, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: employment First thing we tell them is workout extreme caution. There are no guarantees contained in this email. The only thing I can inform you for particular is that if you alter your mind, the firm’s probably not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Is there some category of employee who you think this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is someone like that might this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most cautious because leaving earlier than meant can have serious repercussions, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told reporters that this is a bargain for individuals who do not desire to return to the workplace. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is an idea to federal workers that they need to return in – to work. And if they don’t, then they have the choice to resign, employment and this administration is extremely kindly offering to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in such a way, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it’s designed to get folks who work truly difficult to resign. I believe it’s attempting to pull the wool over a great deal of people’s eyes because there are no assurances. And these are individuals who enjoy their task. They like the mission of the company. They strive. And today, they’re dealing with very tough choices, especially if they’re remote. I imply, it’s very coercive.MARTIN: You say it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: employment Essentially, if you’re somebody who lives in Oregon and has been told to report to D.C. otherwise we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you expect legal difficulties simply to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be sincere, is so extraordinary that I think a lot of us are still attempting to find out what to do with it. I’m uncertain if the offer itself might be challengeable. I believe the larger concern is the execution of these terms. I’m not conscious of any authority that exists today for OPM to order agencies to provide this number of individuals administrative leave. So I think it is really much possibly setting the phase for challenges because I feel OPM has actually vastly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment attorney with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for signing up with us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website regards to usage and approvals pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush due date by an NPR specialist. This text might not be in its final form and may be updated or modified in the future. Accuracy and accessibility might vary. The reliable record of NPR’s shows is the audio record.